Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test sensitivity

نویسندگان

  • Raphael M. Castilhos
  • Marcia L. Chaves
چکیده

We read with great interest the recent article by Teichmann et al. [1], who presented results of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) accuracy to differentiate typical (amnestic) Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from other neurodegenerative diseases. The authors assessed FCSRT in a group of 992 individuals, most of them with the diagnosis of AD, and stated that FCSRT would have a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 75% to diagnose typical AD. A diagnostic test for amnestic variant of AD that is very sensitive and specific in early stages of dementia would be extremely useful to distinguish it more accurately from other neurodegenerative diseases, especially in the context of possible disease-modifying therapy, probably effective in early or prodromic phases. FCSRT has been suggested by the International Working Group as a test to characterize amnestic syndrome of hippocampal type [2] and in fact has been demonstrating high correlation with AD pathology [3] and high sensitivity to predict mild cognitive impairment conversion to dementia [4]. However, we consider that the methods used to analyze the test performance introduced some bias to the results. The authors stated, in the methods section, that FCSRT was used to select patients to enter the study, rather than other test or set of tests, that would diagnose a patient as having amnestic variant of AD; that is, all patients with amnestic hippocampal syndrome were selected by the same instrument that is in fact being tested. Indeed, the sensitivity described in table 1 was 100%, both for AD dementia as for prodromal AD. The use of biomarkers for AD does not help in the mitigation of this bias, as this simply implies that patients included in the study had most likely AD pathology. Both the sensitivity and specificity of a test must be established regardless of the means for which the true diagnosis was established. In other words, the diagnostic test being evaluated should not be a part of the information used to establish the diagnosis [5]. Because there is no gold standard test for the presence of hippocampal amnestic deficits, it would be more useful to compare FCSRT with a larger

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Temporal unfolding of declining episodic memory on the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test in the predementia phase of Alzheimer's disease: Implications for clinical trials

Introduction Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) performance identifies patients with preclinical disease at elevated risk for developing Alzheimer's dementia, predicting diagnosis better than other memory tests. Methods Based on literature mapping FCSRT performance to clinical outcomes and biological markers, and on longitudinal preclinical data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Stu...

متن کامل

Comparison of “Word” vs. “Picture” version of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) in older adults

BACKGROUND This study examined the psychometric relationship between the Word and Picture versions of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) and developed an equation for score conversion. METHODS 187 participants were administered the FCSRT-Picture and FCSRT-Word on two visits using a randomized counterbalanced design. RESULTS Participants had a mean age of 82.1 (sd=5.4) and me...

متن کامل

The free and cued selective reminding test distinguishes frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease.

Memory impairment is often present in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) as a result of an inefficient use of learning strategies, sometimes leading to a misdiagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) is a memory test that controls attention and acquisition, by providing category cues in the learning process. The main goal of this study was to show the u...

متن کامل

Amnestic syndrome of the medial temporal type identifies prodromal AD: a longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVE To compare the power of tests assessing different cognitive domains for the identification of prodromal Alzheimer disease (AD) among patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). BACKGROUND Given the early involvement of the medial temporal lobe, a precocious and specific pattern of memory disorders might be expected for the identification of prodromal AD. METHODS A total of 251 ...

متن کامل

Spanish Multicenter Normative Studies (NEURONORMA Project): norms for the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure (copy and memory), and free and cued selective reminding test.

The Rey-Osterrieth complex figure (ROCF) and the free and cued selective reminding test (FCSRT) are frequently used in clinical practice. The ROCF assesses visual perception, constructional praxis, and visuospatial memory, and the FCSRT assesses verbal learning and memory. As part of the Spanish Normative Studies (NEURONORMA), we provide age- and education-adjusted norms for the ROCF (copy and ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 10  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2018